Head Bolts vs Studs (factory vs. ARP)

New posts disabled. Archived technical discussion about the Datsun PL510
Post Reply
User avatar
Byron510
Moderator
Posts: 12658
Joined: 01 Jul 2003 23:06
Location: Maple Ridge, BC

Head Bolts vs Studs (factory vs. ARP)

Post by Byron510 »

Re: 280ZX turbo factory head bolts vs. ARP L20B stud kit

Just wanted to share my thoughts on this.
Helped my shop mate assemble his vintage race L16 motor today.

Ever felt a head bolt stretch? Neither had I before today! :shock:

While doing the last 10 ft/lbs torque on the bolts (280ZX turbo head bolts) to a total of 60 ft/lbs; on the third last bolt I felt the dreaded ease on the tension... oh s**t! We took the bolts out, sacrificed that head gasket - but to be honest we could not see a difference in the bolt that went soft. It would have been good to have a mic'd before and after length on that bolt. But we didn't take any chances, and we discarded the whole set of bolts at that point.
It's an O ringed block, closed chamber head, and since new pistons just went in on this "freshen up", we didn't want to take chances. Luckily I had another head gasket in my collection of bits at the shop (thanks Hainz!!), and at my work I had an ARP head stud kit that was to be used in my new motor for the Bronze - Paul will get this for now and replace it for me later. At least we got the motor assembled. It's only the second time I've used the ARP head studs, and I can say that I sure do like the "feel" of them being tightened, at least compared to the stock head bolts that I had done an hour and a half earlier in the day. The actual torquing felt more consistently smooth. This may have to do with the moly lube on the thread and under the bearing surface of the ARP nut. The factory bolts were oiled with engine oil – I guess it depends on if you want to believe the ARP “propaganda” that comes with the bolt kits. In any way, the ARP studs definitely felt better being torque to 60 ft/lbs (recommended torque by ARP)
At least tomorrow I can get back to playing with the cutting and grinding on Rob cage, now that the motor is buttoned up and nicely sealed ina bag :D I just couldn't understand why my shop mate didn't want the extra lapping compound in the air while he was assembling :lol:

Byron
Love people and use things,
because the opposite never works.
510rob
Moderator
Posts: 5167
Joined: 09 Oct 2003 23:37
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Head Bolts vs Studs (factory vs. ARP)

Post by 510rob »

Here is a response I received from ARP (Ron F., 2007) regarding the manufacturer's proper procedure for seating head and main studs into the block.

> WITH THE THREADS IN THE BLOCK AND ON THE FASTENER CLEAN. IF THEY GO INTO
> WATER YOU WILL HAVE TO USE THREAD SEALER ON THE THREADS. IF THEY DON'T
> GO INTO WATER THEN YOU CAN USE MOLY LUBE / 30 WEIGHT OIL / LOC-TITE THE
> CHOICE IS YOURS. THE STUDS WILL GO IN THE BLOCK HAND TIGHT ONLY ( ONE OR
> TWO FT LBS OF TORQUE)
> THANKS
> RONF
User avatar
hang_510
Supporter
Posts: 5342
Joined: 14 Mar 2005 16:19
Location: so. cal

Re: Head Bolts vs Studs (factory vs. ARP)

Post by hang_510 »

i have em on both motors and am VERY happy with them.

i used their lube except between those surrounded by water jackets, on those i used thread sealant.

Byron510 wrote:... oh s**t!
what a stud!
byron wrote:I'd be all over that like a fat kid on a smartie.
okayfine wrote:Sense doesn't always have everything to do with it, and I speak from experience.
Post Reply