Narrowing rear control arms

Suspension, including wheel, tire and brake.
User avatar
icehouse
Posts: 3007
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 17:06
Location: Everett Wa

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby icehouse » 12 Apr 2017 23:40

So here is a sneak peak at what we are building. Not only does it narrow the rear track but it also allows us to do some camber/toe progression changes. It's still in it's infancy, we haven't checking loads or figured out how exactly we are going to hook the heim joints to the main beam (Boswell Beam) Or where exactly we are going to place the rods (race rods) don't contact any part of the body under full compression. Also we are going to have to hook one joint on the crossmember in single shear. Either way I can't wait to have one in my car!!!!


Image




Image




Image
I liked Hainz better...... Can we trade back?

User avatar
duke
Supporter
Posts: 1802
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 14:21
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby duke » 13 Apr 2017 09:46

Hey Jeff, that is looking very promising. Here are some pictures I have been sitting on for a while. These are of the rear end of an Australian 810 (?) Bluebird race car. I have always thought that this would be a cool way to set up the rear end of a 510 with minimal impact to the body. It looks very similar to what you are going for except the inner links go to a plate on the diff housing. I would think that this would give a little better camber control than what your initial design.

Image3468251386_eaf9e15586 by Eldukerino, on Flickr

Image3468250706_22187edecd by Eldukerino, on Flickr

Image3468250526_6cf101c61c by Eldukerino, on Flickr

Image3468249488_cc2b98f5fd by Eldukerino, on Flickr

Image3467435889_02f6bd79fe by Eldukerino, on Flickr
Duke Schimmer

'72 2-Door 510
"Simplify and add lightness."

User avatar
icehouse
Posts: 3007
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 17:06
Location: Everett Wa

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby icehouse » 13 Apr 2017 12:15

That is a cool design! Sam and I talked about a similar style as well. For a 1 off it would be totally doable. As for making a production run affordable to the average Datsun dude may be tough. We need to figure out our goal suspension travel. IE trying to get the toe change to zero but what kinda camber gain should we shoot for?

Duke have you ever tested the amount of suspension travel you use in the rear? Maybe Keith knows?
I liked Hainz better...... Can we trade back?

User avatar
Byron510
Moderator
Posts: 11598
Joined: 01 Jul 2003 23:06
Location: Maple Ridge, BC

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby Byron510 » 13 Apr 2017 13:58

Duke - those are some very cool photos... gets the noodle going for sure.

Byron
Love people and use things,
because the opposite never works.

User avatar
bertvorgon
Supporter
Posts: 9777
Joined: 04 Aug 2003 20:45
Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby bertvorgon » 14 Apr 2017 11:22

I can do a measurement next week for you. What it will be is the distance from the control arm to a body part seam. From this you can figure out the wheel travel. I touched this ONCE in all my years, never on the race tracks of any type.

It happened on one of our very fast drives (Duffy Lake) at about 115-120 MPH on a SEVERE bump, loading that side of the car..I heard and felt a "thump".

I would suggest that on rear bump we need about 2.5" minimum (1200# springs). I know I have 2.5 - 2.75 up front ( 300# springs).

That all being said, obviously my car is set up with lots of roll control for all the reasons (racey car). This helps with the camber and toe change, so as the travel goes up...so does the change of toe and camber..so that reverts to... WHAT are you doing with your car IMHO.

As I have talked about before, all this is moot of you run a crap tire, all the G-Whiz setup is NOT going to do any good if you run Sears Roadhandlers, what is the point.

So, given you are aiming for a true handling enthusiast, keeping camber negative and no rear toe out would be the aim.

Jeff, as you and I discussed, if the SHOCK becomes a factor of letting the car pull the wheel up if droop is too stiff, that just screws things up as you well now experienced.
"Racing makes heroin addiction look like a vague wish for something salty" - Peter Egan

1973 2Door Slalom/hill climb/road race / canyon carver /Giant Killer 510
1968 Vintage 3HP Mini Bike
1971 Vintage 13' BOLER trailer

User avatar
icehouse
Posts: 3007
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 17:06
Location: Everett Wa

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby icehouse » 12 Jun 2017 22:17

More updates!! I'm sure some of you guys got to see this at Canby, but for those who didn't! We also test fitted the arm today. It worked out better than we expected, it will require cutting out the nub off for center the stock spring. Which we didn't care to much about. as of now it almost goes as low as the stock arm. Maybe an 1" off. With a slight design change we should be able to get where we want to be. Now for the pics. O and this is a 14x8 -6 Star shark wheel (my favorite JDM wheels so we had to borrow one from Dillon for test fitting.

Image


Image



Image



Image



Image



Image



Image
I liked Hainz better...... Can we trade back?

User avatar
McShagger510
Posts: 1749
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 20:55
Location: East Van, Canada

Re: Narrowing rear control arms

Postby McShagger510 » 13 Jun 2017 23:19

O_RLY-Quite.jpg
O_RLY-Quite.jpg (38.62 KiB) Viewed 121 times
Nothing ventured, nothing grained! - Benjamin Franklin

'72 2dr. 510 Turbo
'73 240Z all stock
'71 2dr. 510 stock......for now
'91 Nissan truck
'78 Kawasaki Z1-R
'84 Kawasaki GPZ750 Turbo
'99 Kawasaki ZRX1100


Return to “Suspension”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests