The least reliable, "reliable L series" ever

View and post your 510 project(s)
User avatar
jason
Supporter
Posts: 4969
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 18:00
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Re: Oops, I broke my '68 510.

Post by jason »

Jim, the Run Beyond Hope has been postponed to July 10 so you can still make it!
Jason
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: Oops, I broke my '68 510.

Post by jim.nos »

okayfine wrote:Congrats on the "first start" even if it isn't.
The 240° - how are you measuring that? That's borderline damaging, if that's the actual temp.
I'll consider it the first re-start.

240 is according to the gauge on the dash. I'm not sure about the accuracy but a thermostat is a cheap and easy first step.
jason wrote:Jim, the Run Beyond Hope has been postponed to July 10 so you can still make it!
Awesome
User avatar
James
Posts: 2138
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 19:58
Location: Laguna Beach, Ca

Re: Oops, I broke my '68 510.

Post by James »

jim.nos wrote: Finished is better than perfect, finished is better than perfect, finished is better than perfect...
Its a very good mantra to have! :wink:
Finished is better than perfect......
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by jim.nos »

I feel bad. My car has sat in the garage for almost 3 months now without being thought about.

During the run beyond hope, the temperature/fluid loss problem was first discovered. Other driving in the summer has had the fluid loss problem increase. I think It's about time I addressed that.

There are no leaks in the rad or hoses. After driving for an hour with an empty water bottle zap strapped to the grille as a burp tank; I collected only a few drops. This is far from the approximate 1.5 litres per hour I'm losing. Even though there is no steam or visible water vapour coming from the tailpipe, and without a pressure tester so I can really stick my head around the engine bay with the motor off, I think a head gasket replacement is in order.

Is an L series head gasket replacement an easy or slightly more challenging thing to do? I'm contemplating moving my car back to work where there is a better equipped and more spacious shop than my garage at home.
User avatar
okayfine
Supporter
Posts: 14154
Joined: 12 Nov 2007 23:02
Location: Newbury Park, CA

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by okayfine »

Relatively easy, all things considered. The key is to use and remember to remove the chain tensioner tool.

If you don't have any other information on HG replacment, there is this: http://dimequarterly.tierranet.com/arti ... asket.html

No pictures. Quite likely a few threads here as well.
Because when you spend a silly amount of money on a silly, trivial thing that will help you not one jot, you are demonstrating that you have a soul and a heart and that you are the sort of person who has no time for Which? magazine. – Jeremy Clarkson
User avatar
jason
Supporter
Posts: 4969
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 18:00
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by jason »

I just finished one in my driveway Jim, it's pretty easy, just a lot messy!
Jason
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by jim.nos »

Turns out that there was more to the story than just a blown head gasket.

Not enough metal is remaining between the water jacket and cylinders.

Going to add a little meat to the head so more of the gasket can actually seal. Then off to get the head machined and have a valve grind and I should be back in business.

I tried my hardest to avoid disassembling the block and I seem to have avoided it.
Last edited by jim.nos on 08 Jun 2013 19:12, edited 1 time in total.
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by jim.nos »

Well, re-assembly is complete and went "well. "

I filled the coolant and went to fetch a funnel to add oil to find that water was POURING from the head onto the floor.

Outside of forgetting to torque the head bolts properly (which I did), what could I possibly have done wrong to have water pour from the gap between the head and the block? The last thing I really want to do at this stage is pull the dead off again to find everything contaminated with water and need to start over.
User avatar
James
Posts: 2138
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 19:58
Location: Laguna Beach, Ca

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by James »

Did you torque head bolts in proper order - from middle to outside? (going from outside in can create proplems) I'm assuming that they checked for crack in the head. Was your gasket surface perfectly clean?
Its odd to have a leak after doing all that you have done. Its probably something simple - but to find it you may have to take head off again. The good news - it goes really fast the second time (I can attest)!
Finished is better than perfect......
datzenmike
Supporter
Posts: 6080
Joined: 24 May 2006 12:40
Location: Van. Isle.

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by datzenmike »

If leaking on the driver's side it could be the intake leaking from the coolant passages. Are the manifold bolts tight, gasket on properly?

You can still loosen all bolts and re-do the tightening sequence. The head should be torqued to about 20 ft. lbs. in this pattern

RAD
7-8
3-4
1-2
5-6
9-10

Now go back and re-torque in the same pattern to 40 ft. lbs. Lastly, re-torque to a final 60 ft. lbs.

As for the head and block surfaces, the general rule is.. you can't have them too clean or smooth. Bolt holes and bolt threads must be scrupulously clean so that an accurate clamping force can be achieved with a torque wrench. If there is debris in the holes the bolt can 'bottom out' without bearing down properly on the head itself. Wipe the bolt threads with an oily rag and put a drop of oil on the washer under the bolt head.

Be sure that both alignment dowels are in the block, and the head and gasket can position itself.
"Nissan 'shit the bed' when they made these, plain and simple." McShagger510 on flattop SUs
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: The least reliable, "reliable" L20 ever

Post by jim.nos »

Today was supposed to an easy tinker time.
Today was supposed to be an easy carb tune, swap some jets and go for a hoon.

Remove the air cleaner to discover this rattling around inside the filter
Image
Well this doesn't look good.

Remove the plugs to check compression
Image
Well that doesn't look good either

Have a peek inside the engine to see what's up
Image
Aaaaaaand that's a hole.
Last edited by jim.nos on 19 Jun 2013 09:47, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
bertvorgon
Supporter
Posts: 12017
Joined: 04 Aug 2003 20:45
Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada

Re: The least reliable, "reliable" L20 ever

Post by bertvorgon »

OWEEEEE...something let go......
"Racing makes heroin addiction look like a vague wish for something salty" - Peter Egan

Keith Law
1973 2 Door Slalom/hill climb/road race / canyon carver /Giant Killer 510
1971 Vintage 13' BOLER trailer
jim.nos
Posts: 112
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 21:07
Location: YVR

Re: The continuing tales of the '68 that refuses to stay wor

Post by jim.nos »

jim.nos wrote:Well, re-assembly is complete and went "well. "

I filled the coolant and went to fetch a funnel to add oil to find that water was POURING from the head onto the floor.

Outside of forgetting to torque the head bolts properly (which I did), what could I possibly have done wrong to have water pour from the gap between the head and the block? The last thing I really want to do at this stage is pull the dead off again to find everything contaminated with water and need to start over.
To follow up my own post from a while ago, there were two studs protruding from the block which passed through the manifold with no apparent purpose; so I removed them.

Turns out that they plugged two holes that lead straight into the water jacket.

Stopped them up and we're all good as far as the coolant retention department goes.
User avatar
Baz
Posts: 521
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 07:34
Location: Lonsdale South OZ

Re: The least reliable, "reliable L series" ever

Post by Baz »

Rear arms can be filled with 2 pack expanding foam.
Adds considerable strength & resistance to bending.

A client slightly bent an arm after rolling in a rally. He works for an engineering firm.
They sat the arm in a 10 ton drop hammer, mandrel thro the bearing mount & got stuck into it with a 16 lb sledge.
They gave up when the hammer stated bouncing.
User avatar
two_68_510s
Supporter
Posts: 3894
Joined: 18 Apr 2010 11:20
Location: Ben Lomond California

Re: The least reliable, "reliable L series" ever

Post by two_68_510s »

Baz wrote:Rear arms can be filled with 2 pack expanding foam.
Adds considerable strength & resistance to bending.

A client slightly bent an arm after rolling in a rally. He works for an engineering firm.
They sat the arm in a 10 ton drop hammer, mandrel thro the bearing mount & got stuck into it with a 16 lb sledge.
They gave up when the hammer stated bouncing.
Excellent!! I love this kind of stuff!
Joel

2 '68 510 2 door sedans
'95 240SX


“We will either find a way, or make one.” – Hannibal
Post Reply